🌵
OpenClaw / SAAB — Verification Audit
handoff claims re-derived from code · git · live fetch
Core verified · no high/medium findings
AUDIT · 2026-05-28
method: evidence-based
re-verified live
// Verified
✓Clean across all public repositories — no credentials or secrets found in any public repo, HEAD or full history (verified live).
✓Seed→key algorithm — bench pair reproduces exactly, confirmed by two independent implementations.
✓API parity suite — 315/315 byte-perfect against the reference oracle.
✓DTC catalog — 1,735 codes across 36 modules (exact match).
✓Tech2Win-Parrot engine — preserved engine sizes match; blocker confirmed at vcilib.c 1124 1.
✓Git history & live dashboard — bench-iteration commits present; source-of-truth dashboard reachable.
// Findings — minor (hygiene & staleness)
● LOWStale status lines in the handoff
A few figures have drifted from reality: the Collector is past v0.3.0-alpha (the handoff still says v0.2.8-alpha); the "8/8 tests" figure is now 315/315 on a different suite; and "security_calc.py — 3 copies" is actually 4 divergent implementations (they agree on the bench pair today, but four same-named files is a drift trap).
Action Refresh the status lines; consolidate security_calc.py to one source of truth.
● LOWLarge uncommitted working tree
The workspace repo carries 163 uncommitted changes. For a project whose own operating rule is "write it down or it didn't happen," that's a lot of unsaved state — and one bad command from loss.
Action Commit in logical chunks.